Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Wednesday, January 9 The Art of the Interview





Learning Targets: 1)I can engage in using a wide range of prewriting strategies, such as visual representations to make connections and insights.

2) I can integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g.,

visually, quantitatively, orally) in order to make informed decisions. 

3) Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, assessing the

stance, premises, links among ideas, word choice, points of emphasis, and tone used.

As you read through the background material on the man below, you might wonder what a director at the National Portrait Gallery and Smithsonian might have to say about interviews. Those of you who are in the visual studies probably already understand how difficult it is to capture an authentic image of an individual, to reveal the full panoply of a character through line, contour, color and perspective.  Portraits may take months, or even years, and are often constructed as much through conversation as the artistic process.  In class, I am asking you to listen to a 20 minute Ted Talk on "The Art of the Interview".


When you have finished, please write down 5 points you took away from the talk that will help you be a better interviewer.  Please compose these in complete sentences, weaving in text. Due at the close of class, with the exception of those who receive extended time.   I suggest you pause the talk and compose your points as you listen. 


Marc Pachter The Art of the Interview


Marc Pachter (born 1942 or 1943)[1] is an American museum director who headed up the United States National Portrait Gallery from 2000 until 2007 and was the acting director (after coming back out of retirement) of the National Museum of American History between 2011 and 2012, both at the Smithsonian.
“Marc Pachter.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 19 July 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Pachter.

The Art of the Interview


Transcript


0:11The National Portrait Gallery is the place dedicated to presenting great American lives, amazing people.And that's what it's about. We use portraiture as a way to deliver those lives, but that's it. And so I'm not going to talk about the painted portrait today. I'm going to talk about a program I started there, which, from my point of view, is the proudest thing I did.
0:37I started to worry about the fact that a lot of people don't get their portraits painted anymore, and they're amazing people, and we want to deliver them to future generations. So, how do we do that? And so I came up with the idea of the living self-portrait series. And the living self-portrait series was the idea of basically my being a brush in the hand of amazing people who would come and I would interview.
1:02And so what I'm going to do is, not so much give you the great hits of that program, as to give you this whole notion of how you encounter people in that kind of situation, what you try to find out about them,and when people deliver and when they don't and why.
1:19Now, I had two preconditions. One was that they be American. That's just because, in the nature of the National Portrait Gallery, it's created to look at American lives. That was easy, but then I made the decision, maybe arbitrary, that they needed to be people of a certain age, which at that point, when I created this program, seemed really old. Sixties, seventies, eighties and nineties. For obvious reasons, it doesn't seem that old anymore to me.
1:48And why did I do that? Well, for one thing, we're a youth-obsessed culture. And I thought really what we need is an elders program to just sit at the feet of amazing people and hear them talk. But the second part of it -- and the older I get, the more convinced I am that that's true. It's amazing what people will say when they know how the story turned out. That's the one advantage that older people have. Well, they have other, little bit of advantage, but they also have some disadvantages, but the one thing they or we have is that we've reached the point in life where we know how the story turned out. So, we can then go back in our lives, if we've got an interviewer who gets that, and begin to reflect on how we got there. All of those accidents that wound up creating the life narrative that we inherited.
2:42So, I thought okay, now, what is it going to take to make this work? There are many kinds of interviews. We know them. There are the journalist interviews, which are the interrogation that is expected. This is somewhat against resistance and caginess on the part of the interviewee. Then there's the celebrity interview, where it's more important who's asking the question than who answers. That's Barbara Walters and others like that, and we like that. That's Frost-Nixon, where Frost seems to be as importantas Nixon in that process. Fair enough.
3:15But I wanted interviews that were different. I wanted to be, as I later thought of it, empathic, which is to say, to feel what they wanted to say and to be an agent of their self-revelation. By the way, this was always done in public. This was not an oral history program. This was all about 300 people sitting at the feet of this individual, and having me be the brush in their self-portrait.
3:46Now, it turns out that I was pretty good at that. I didn't know it coming into it. And the only reason I really know that is because of one interview I did with Senator William Fulbright, and that was six months after he'd had a stroke. And he had never appeared in public since that point. This was not a devastating stroke, but it did affect his speaking and so forth. And I thought it was worth a chance, he thought it was worth a chance, and so we got up on the stage, and we had an hour conversation about his life, and after that a woman rushed up to me, essentially did, and she said, "Where did you train as a doctor?"
4:26And I said, "I have no training as a doctor. I never claimed that."
4:30And she said, "Well, something very weird was happening. When he started a sentence, particularly in the early parts of the interview, and paused, you gave him the word, the bridge to get to the end of the sentence, and by the end of it, he was speaking complete sentences on his own." I didn't know what was going on, but I was so part of the process of getting that out.
4:54So I thought, okay, fine, I've got empathy, or empathy, at any rate, is what's critical to this kind of interview. But then I began to think of other things. Who makes a great interview in this context? It had nothing to do with their intellect, the quality of their intellect. Some of them were very brilliant, some of them were, you know, ordinary people who would never claim to be intellectuals, but it was never about that. It was about their energy. It's energy that creates extraordinary interviews and extraordinary lives.I'm convinced of it. And it had nothing to do with the energy of being young. These were people through their 90s.
5:37In fact, the first person I interviewed was George Abbott, who was 97, and Abbott was filled with the life force -- I guess that's the way I think about it -- filled with it. And so he filled the room, and we had an extraordinary conversation. He was supposed to be the toughest interview that anybody would ever dobecause he was famous for being silent, for never ever saying anything except maybe a word or two.And, in fact, he did wind up opening up -- by the way, his energy is evidenced in other ways. He subsequently got married again at 102, so he, you know, he had a lot of the life force in him.
6:16But after the interview, I got a call, very gruff voice, from a woman. I didn't know who she was, and she said, "Did you get George Abbott to talk?"
6:28And I said, "Yeah. Apparently I did."
6:31And she said, "I'm his old girlfriend, Maureen Stapleton, and I could never do it." And then she made me go up with the tape of it and prove that George Abbott actually could talk.
6:43So, you know, you want energy, you want the life force, but you really want them also to think that they have a story worth sharing. The worst interviews that you can ever have are with people who are modest.Never ever get up on a stage with somebody who's modest, because all of these people have been assembled to listen to them, and they sit there and they say, "Aw, shucks, it was an accident." There's nothing that ever happens that justifies people taking good hours of the day to be with them.
7:19The worst interview I ever did: William L. Shirer. The journalist who did "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich." This guy had met Hitler and Gandhi within six months, and every time I'd ask him about it, he'd say, "Oh, I just happened to be there. Didn't matter." Whatever. Awful. I never would ever agree to interview a modest person. They have to think that they did something and that they want to share it with you.
7:46But it comes down, in the end, to how do you get through all the barriers we have. All of us are public and private beings, and if all you're going to get from the interviewee is their public self, there's no point in it. It's pre-programmed. It's infomercial, and we all have infomercials about our lives. We know the great lines, we know the great moments, we know what we're not going to share, and the point of this was not to embarrass anybody. This wasn't -- and some of you will remember Mike Wallace's old interviews -- tough, aggressive and so forth. They have their place.
8:29I was trying to get them to say what they probably wanted to say, to break out of their own cocoon of the public self, and the more public they had been, the more entrenched that person, that outer person was.And let me tell you at once the worse moment and the best moment that happened in this interview series. It all has to do with that shell that most of us have, and particularly certain people.
9:00There's an extraordinary woman named Clare Boothe Luce. It'll be your generational determinant as to whether her name means much to you. She did so much. She was a playwright. She did an extraordinary play called "The Women." She was a congresswoman when there weren't very many congresswomen.She was editor of Vanity Fair, one of the great phenomenal women of her day. And, incidentally, I call herthe Eleanor Roosevelt of the Right. She was sort of adored on the Right the way Eleanor Roosevelt was on the Left. And, in fact, when we did the interview -- I did the living self-portrait with her -- there were three former directors of the CIA basically sitting at her feet, just enjoying her presence.
9:51And I thought, this is going to be a piece of cake, because I always have preliminary talks with these people for just maybe 10 or 15 minutes. We never talk before that because if you talk before, you don't get it on the stage. So she and I had a delightful conversation.
10:09We were on the stage and then -- by the way, spectacular. It was all part of Clare Boothe Luce's look.She was in a great evening gown. She was 80, almost that day of the interview, and there she was and there I was, and I just proceeded into the questions. And she stonewalled me. It was unbelievable.Anything that I would ask, she would turn around, dismiss, and I was basically up there -- any of you in the moderate-to-full entertainment world know what it is to die onstage. And I was dying. She was absolutely not giving me a thing.
10:49And I began to wonder what was going on, and you think while you talk, and basically, I thought, I got it.When we were alone, I was her audience. Now I'm her competitor for the audience. That's the problem here, and she's fighting me for that, and so then I asked her a question -- I didn't know how I was going to get out of it -- I asked her a question about her days as a playwright, and again, characteristically,instead of saying, "Oh yes, I was a playwright, and this is what blah blah blah," she said, "Oh, playwright. Everybody knows I was a playwright. Most people think that I was an actress. I was never an actress."But I hadn't asked that, and then she went off on a tear, and she said, "Oh, well, there was that one time that I was an actress. It was for a charity in Connecticut when I was a congresswoman, and I got up there," and she went on and on, "And then I got on the stage."
11:41And then she turned to me and said, "And you know what those young actors did? They upstaged me." And she said, "Do you know what that is?" Just withering in her contempt.
11:50And I said, "I'm learning."
11:52(Laughter)
11:54And she looked at me, and it was like the successful arm-wrestle, and then, after that, she delivered an extraordinary account of what her life really was like.
12:05I have to end that one. This is my tribute to Clare Boothe Luce. Again, a remarkable person. I'm not politically attracted to her, but through her life force, I'm attracted to her. And the way she died -- she had, toward the end, a brain tumor. That's probably as terrible a way to die as you can imagine, and very few of us were invited to a dinner party.
12:30And she was in horrible pain. We all knew that. She stayed in her room. Everybody came. The butler passed around canapes. The usual sort of thing. Then at a certain moment, the door opened and she walked out perfectly dressed, completely composed. The public self, the beauty, the intellect, and she walked around and talked to every person there and then went back into the room and was never seen again. She wanted the control of her final moment, and she did it amazingly.
13:06Now, there are other ways that you get somebody to open up, and this is just a brief reference. It wasn't this arm-wrestle, but it was a little surprising for the person involved. I interviewed Steve Martin. It wasn't all that long ago. And we were sitting there, and almost toward the beginning of the interview, I turned to him and I said, "Steve," or "Mr. Martin, it is said that all comedians have unhappy childhoods. Was yours unhappy?"
13:40And he looked at me, you know, as if to say, "This is how you're going to start this thing, right off?" And then he turned to me, not stupidly, and he said, "What was your childhood like?"
13:52And I said -- these are all arm wrestles, but they're affectionate -- and I said, "My father was loving and supportive, which is why I'm not funny."
14:00(Laughter)
14:02And he looked at me, and then we heard the big sad story. His father was an SOB, and, in fact, he was another comedian with an unhappy childhood, but then we were off and running. So the question is:What is the key that's going to allow this to proceed?
14:19Now, these are arm wrestle questions, but I want to tell you about questions that are more related to empathy and that really, very often, are the questions that people have been waiting their whole lives to be asked. And I'll just give you two examples of this because of the time constraints.
14:37One was an interview I did with one of the great American biographers. Again, some of you will know him, most of you won't, Dumas Malone. He did a five-volume biography of Thomas Jefferson, spent virtually his whole life with Thomas Jefferson, and by the way, at one point I asked him, "Would you like to have met him?"
14:58And he said, "Well, of course, but actually, I know him better than anyone who ever met him, because I got to read all of his letters." So, he was very satisfied with the kind of relationship they had over 50 years.
15:11And I asked him one question. I said, "Did Jefferson ever disappoint you?"
15:18And here is this man who had given his whole life to uncovering Jefferson and connecting with him, and he said, "Well ..." -- I'm going to do a bad southern accent. Dumas Malone was from Mississippi originally. But he said, "Well," he said, "I'm afraid so." He said, "You know, I've read everything, and sometimes Mr. Jefferson would smooth the truth a bit."
15:48And he basically was saying that this was a man who lied more than he wished he had, because he saw the letters. He said, "But I understand that." He said, "I understand that." He said, "We southerners do like a smooth surface, so that there were times when he just didn't want the confrontation."
16:09And he said, "Now, John Adams was too honest." And he started to talk about that, and later on he invited me to his house, and I met his wife who was from Massachusetts, and he and she had exactly the relationship of Thomas Jefferson and John Adams. She was the New Englander and abrasive, and he was this courtly fellow.
16:29But really the most important question I ever asked, and most of the times when I talk about it, people kind of suck in their breath at my audacity, or cruelty, but I promise you it was the right question. This was to Agnes de Mille. Agnes de Mille is one of the great choreographers in our history. She basically created the dances in "Oklahoma," transforming the American theater. An amazing woman.
16:59At the time that I proposed to her that -- by the way, I would have proposed to her; she was extraordinary -- but proposed to her that she come on. She said, "Come to my apartment." She lived in New York."Come to my apartment and we'll talk for those 15 minutes, and then we'll decide whether we proceed."
17:18And so I showed up in this dark, rambling New York apartment, and she called out to me, and she was in bed. I had known that she had had a stroke, and that was some 10 years before. And so she spent almost all of her life in bed, but -- I speak of the life force -- her hair was askew. She wasn't about to make up for this occasion.
17:42And she was sitting there surrounded by books, and her most interesting possession she felt at that moment was her will, which she had by her side. She wasn't unhappy about this. She was resigned. She said, "I keep this will by my bed, memento mori, and I change it all the time just because I want to." And she was loving the prospect of death as much as she had loved life. I thought, this is somebody I've got to get in this series.
18:18She agreed. She came on. Of course she was wheelchaired on. Half of her body was stricken, the other half not. She was, of course, done up for the occasion, but this was a woman in great physical distress.And we had a conversation, and then I asked her this unthinkable question. I said, "Was it a problem for you in your life that you were not beautiful?"
18:48And the audience just -- you know, they're always on the side of the interviewee, and they felt that this was a kind of assault, but this was the question she had wanted somebody to ask her whole life. And she began to talk about her childhood, when she was beautiful, and she literally turned -- here she was, in this broken body -- and she turned to the audience and described herself as the fair demoiselle with her red hair and her light steps and so forth, and then she said, "And then puberty hit."
19:24And she began to talk about things that had happened to her body and her face, and how she could no longer count on her beauty, and her family then treated her like the ugly sister of the beautiful one for whom all the ballet lessons were given. And she had to go along just to be with her sister for company,and in that process, she made a number of decisions. First of all, was that dance, even though it hadn't been offered to her, was her life. And secondly, she had better be, although she did dance for a while, a choreographer because then her looks didn't matter. But she was thrilled to get that out as a real, real fact in her life.
20:07It was an amazing privilege to do this series. There were other moments like that, very few moments of silence. The key point was empathy because everybody in their lives is really waiting for people to ask them questions, so that they can be truthful about who they are and how they became what they are, and I commend that to you, even if you're not doing interviews. Just be that way with your friends and particularly the older members of your family.
20:43Thank you very much.

Saturday, January 5, 2019

Monday / Tuesday/ January 7 / 8 / Stephen Colbert interviews Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama was the first First Lady to court an air of “relatability,” and her memoir, “Becoming,” marks her second coming, as an unprecedented, potentially billion-dollar brand.
Photograph by Scott Olson / Getty

Michelle Obama’s New Reign of Soft Power


Since Lady Bird Johnson, with the exception of only Pat Nixon, every First Lady has published a memoir. (Our most literary First Lady, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, never did.) Traditionally, these books, written in the language of women’s magazines, exalt the Presidential station. Obama’s was expected to be something different: she had more in common with Alice Walker than with Nancy Reagan, after all.

 Before there was a memoir by Michelle, there were literary love letters to her: thank-you notes in T magazine, in October of 2016, written by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Rashida Jones, Gloria Steinem, and Jon Meacham; a collection of essays, The Meaning of Michelle,” written by prominent black women writers; millions of messages dispersed on social media in a time of political whiplash and despair. 

The memoir has been marketed as truth-telling and life-affirming, an artifact from a lost time of moral uprightness and elegance. Since its publication, on November 13th, it has sold more than two million copies.

Félix, Doreen St. “Michelle Obama's New Reign of Soft Power.” The New Yorker, The New Yorker, 7 Dec. 2018, www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/michelle-obamas-new-reign-of-soft-power.

In class. Make sure you have your earbuds! 

To continue with our interview unit, we are first watching the a recent interview that Stephen Colbert had with Michelle Obama, afterwhich you will watch it again independently and respond to the accompanying questions below. However, I am giving you handout, as this will make it easier for you to listen, pause and respond as you progress through the interview. Although the interview itself is less than 30 minutes, it will take two classes to complete the assignment. NOTE THAT THE REPONSES ARE A WRITING GRADE (50% category). 

Stephen Colbert is an effective interviewer. The questions concern style and technique. Note how he is always in charge of the reins; nevertheless, Michelle is also a pro, and is cautious, yet sincere, in her responses. I will ask you to note some of her words specifically and provide a personal commentary. You may not share earbuds!

The assignment is due at the close of class Tuesday.
Colbert interviewing Michelle Obama (28 min)


Name_______________________________     for Monday / Tuesday, January 7 and 8
Accompanying questions for Stephen Colbert’s interview with Michelle Obama
Please read, pause and respond, as you listen and watch the interview.  The link is on the blog. Make this legible!
1.     What is the purpose of this interview?
________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
2.     Why does Colbert begin the interview by quoting from Becoming? _________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3.     Why did Michelle create transcripts during the White House years? (Weave in her words.)


4.     How does Colbert respond, in order to maintain the fluidity of the conversation? _______________________________________________________________________
5.     How does Colbert metaphorically paraphrase Michelle’s response?
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
6.     What two “heart-wrenching” events occurred the same day in Michelle’s life?

___________________________________________________________
7.     What information on Michelle’s childhood does Colbert use to segue into the next question?

8 What question does Colbert ask Michelle that follows, so as to change the tone of the interview? Why do you think he does this? (do not use “I think”!




9 Colbert observes to Michelle that her marriage was defined as a “partnership” and “sounding board”. How does Michelle respond?


10. Colbert quotes FDR, saying the presidency is a “moral position” and people look to the president for a “moral center.” How does Colbert personalize his observation when asking his next question of Michelle? (pause for a moment at 17:02) Note Colbert and Michelle’s body language.

11. What do you anticipate at the next question?_____________________________________________________________________

12. How does Michelle respond in order to maintain the “higher moral” ground?(Weave in her words)______________________________________________________________________
13. Part 3: legacy  Colbert begins by summing up Barack and Michelle’s “abrupt” political rise.  Listen and watch carefully. What relationship has been established between Colbert and Michelle? How is demonstrated in their conversation?


15. Colbert asks Michelle how she keeps from being “cynical” in politics. What is her universal message? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 16. Why does Colbert read statements with no commentary?__________________________________________________________________

17. What is Colbert’s last question to Michelle? Why does he ask this?



Thursday, January 3, 2019

Thursday / Friday January 3/ 4 introduction to interviews

introduction to interview unit : types of interviews and questions

Introduction to types of interviews and questions

IMPORTANT: you will need ear buds next Monday. 

Learning Target: I can analyze the purpose of information, so as to propel a conversation by posing and responding to questions that probe reasoning and evidence, ensuring a full range of positions on a topic or issue; clarify, verify or challenge ideas and conclusions; and promote divergent and creative perspectives.

Class directions: 1. Read through the definition of an interview and the types of interviews.
                           2. Note specifically the objective behind the interview style
                           3. Please respond to the 7 questions that follow this information.
                            4. When you have finished the above, read the directions for back to back interviews.
                            5. Send along the interview questions and the "back to back" questions (part A and B) as one document.  
                            6. All work is due by midnight Friday, with the exception of those who receive extended time. 
                            Thank you.


What is interview? 


Meaning of interview: The word interview comes from Latin and middle French words meaning to “see between” or “see each other”. Generally, interview means a private meeting between people when questions are asked and answered. 
So, an interview is formal meetings between two people (the interviewer and the interviewee) where questions are asked by the interviewer to obtain information, qualities, attitudes, wishes etc.
Types of Interviews
  1. Personal interviews: Personal interviews include:
    • Selection of the employees
    • Promotion of the employees
    • Retirement and resignation of the employees
    Of course, this type of interview is designed to obtain information through discussion and observation about how well the interviewer will perform on the job.
  2. Evaluation interviews: The interviews which take place annually to review the progress of the interviewee are called the evaluation interviews. Naturally, it is occurring between superiors and subordinates. The main objective of this interview is to find out the strengths and weaknesses of the employees.
  3. Persuasive interviews: This type of interview is designed to sell someone a product or an idea. When a sales representative talk with a target buyer, persuasion takes the form of convincing the target that the product or idea meets a need.
  4. Structured interviews: Structured interviews tend to follow formal procedures; the interviewer follows a predetermined agenda or questions.
  5. Unstructured interviews: When the interview does not follow the formal rules or procedures. It is called an unstructured interview. The discussion will probably be free flowing and may shift rapidly form on subject to another depending on the interests of the interviewee and the interviewer.
  6. Counseling interviews: This may be held to find out what has been troubling the workers and why someone has not been working.
  7. Disciplinary interviews: Disciplinary interviews are occurring when an employee has been accused of breaching the organization’s rules and procedures.
  8. Stress interviews: It is designed to place the interviewee in a stress situation in order to observe the interviewees reaction.
  9. Public interviews: These include political parties’ radio-television and newspaper.
  10. Informal or conversational interview: In the conversational interview, no predetermined questions are asked, in order to remain as open and adaptable a possible to the interviewee’s nature and priorities; during the interview the interviewer “goes with the flow”.
  11. General interview guide approach: The guide approach is intended to ensure that the same general areas of information are collected from each interviewee this provides more focus than the conversational approach but still allows a degree of freedom and adaptability in getting the information from the interviewee.
  12. Standardized or open-ended interview: Here the same open-ended questions are asked to all interviewees; this approach facilitates faster interviews faster interviews that can be more easily analyzed and compared.
  13. Closed or fixed-response interview: It is an interview where all interviewers ask the same questions and asked to choose answers from among the same set of alternatives. This formal is useful for those not practiced in interviewing.
Please send along your responses to the following questions, which are based upon the above information once you have completed parts A and B of the assignment.

A. 1. What type of interview would someone use on the telephone to elicit your thoughts on a particular product?

2. What type of interview would one have if called to Ms. Aspenleiter's office?

3. What type of interview would one have if the representative of a political candidate stopped you at the mall to talk about an impending election?

4. What type of interview would a couple have who wished to work out difficulties in their relationship?

5. What type of interview do the late night television hosts conduct?

6. What type of interview would the human resource representative conduct when someone is applying for a position in the company? 

7. What type of interview would the mayor of Gotham City give when discussing the latest crime wave?

B. BACK TO BACK INTERVIEWS:


Take a look at the following types of questions 


and especially the samples given. 




 1. Now select an historical figure.  This may be someone in realm of 

politics, sports or the arts; however, each has one thing in common: 

each is dead.  

2. Read a minimum of two sources about this individual. In this situation, Wikipedia is acceptable for one.  Create a citation for each, which should be listed at the end of your back to back interview.

The purpose is to have an understanding of this person's life, much as you would have the understanding of the context of a person or
situation prior to conducting any interview. 

 Now compose a list of questions asking two of each type of question listed below; that's a total of twelve questions. (That's a total of 12.)

 They should be rich, pithy in depth questions. Your deceased interviewee will not be responding. The goal is in asking insightful questions, so as to elicit honest, thoughtful responses. 

Below is a model of how the questions should be framed.

Note the following questions clearly demonstrate that I have read some background material on James Baldwin.

 As an example,  here is a chronological question I might ask James Baldwin:

Mr. Baldwin, you said that: "Once I found myself on the other side of the ocean, I see where I came from very clearly...I am the grandson of a slave, and I am a writer. I must deal with both." Could you explain to me how your reconciled the legacy of slavery with your writing career?

or a suggestive question:

How might your life have been different if you had not met Richard Wright?

or an explanation question:

How did you come to a personal realization that one's sexuality is fluid?



Again: Send along both the interview questions for part A and the 12  "back to back" questions from your interview with your departed individual by midnight on Friday. Include the two cited sources  on your document. Have fun. 
 
 Note that the sample styles of questions: basic,

explanation, justification, suggestive, choice and 


chronological.   

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

Wednesday, January 2 year review / letters to the editor

Image result for January

Welcome back:

To begin today, we are looking back at 2018. Here are the biggest stories of this past year.
2018 stories


Now the best photojournalist images


                                                                   
India decriminalises homosexuality


Palestinian protester, Gaza City


                             Morning in a cattle camp, South Sudan



Woman in the aftermath of an earthquake, Indonesia



The Saudi consulate after Jamal Khashoggi’s murder



 Golfers ignore an erupting volcano, Hawaii





Stuck in the mud at the Dakar rally



US border agents detain a Honduran mother and child



The gunwomen of Pennsylvania




The running of the bulls, Pamplona, Spain



Mass start of the Ironman Barcelona



Road destroyed by earthquake in Alaska
LASTLY:


Number of journalists killed on the job in 2018 rises

IFJ says 94 journalists and media workers died in targeted killings, bomb attacks and crossfire incidents this year.
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) said on Monday that 94 journalists and media workers died in targeted killings, bomb attacks and crossfire incidents this year.

guardians of the truth stop 1:58

In class today:  
Handing out grade reports. We have 12 classes before the end of second quarter. Late material will be accepted  until Friday, January 18. The following week are Regents Exams. If I did not give your credit for something, please send it along NOW. 
In class: go to the blog and read through the news articles. Select two of them and write a "Letter to the editor". This should be a minimum of a 25 word response. This should be a comment on the topic in support, opposition or an extension of the article. This is not a ELA critique.  Post these in the response section below the article. Make sure to include your name, in order to receive credit.


Tuesday-Thursday, June 4-6 photo narratives

Year-end round up of graded assignments: 1. Personal theme choice: This was due on Monday, June 3. (Most of you sent those along. Tha...